Showing posts with label Movie/Music Reviews. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Movie/Music Reviews. Show all posts

Monday, March 19, 2007

Namesake

That one scene did it….towards the end of the film when Ashoke walks with his 4 year old along the rocky ridge that invades out into the raucous ocean and says “Remember this moment for a long long time Gogol, that we had walked out to a place where the land had ended and we had nowhere to go” The angst captured in that shot welled up my eyes. When they are gone, we usually remember our parents from such ideal snapshots of life, the words that they had spoken on the side, that comment made within the moribund household setting, but that which brings with them a flood of memories which inundates you for the rest of your life. Knowing her oeuvre, this form of cinematic magic is not unexpected from Mira Nair.

Namesake is an episodic canvas that beyond all, tries to recreate the strands that tie us to our roots and home. Although the subject in this particular case is of a Bengali family struggling to find its moorings in the America of the 70’s and 80’s, the story itself is universal. But no tale is complete without a set of characters that nuanced and scripted out eminently. Ashima (Tabu), the typical Bengali girl in from a culture conscious Kolkata household of the 60’s, who simply waltzes into a marriage because she like her prospective groom’s shoes. Ashoke (Irfan Khan) the studious, gentle and lost-in-the-worlds husband who together with his wife built this poignant strand of understanding between themselves and who, as a father could not be more expressive than being able to present his son with a book on Grad day. This is too close to life. We have seen and known so many people, parents of our friends and relatives, who continue to be that invisible rock without anyone ever noticing it. Ashoke’s exit midway in the film, was a script written by himself, understated, very much the way he lived his life. The subsequent turmoil tit wrecks on the Ganguli’s and the evolution of Gogol (Kal Penn) as a person is captured immaculately. The scene in which Gogol visits his fathers pad in Ohio after his death and sees the bed undone, the way it was when he left it for ever, is a blowout. The old memories come flooding by, this man who has given you this world has after all just lived like a shadow and for the last proof of his existence you have the bed which could still have that residual warmth, that you never could partake during his lifetime….....

If to write a book, Jhumpa Lahiri has woven a surfeit of emotions into words, Mira Nair has accomplished the almost impossible task of bringing the characters to life and making them live their parts. “Gone with the wind” on celluloid does not look as impressive as the book itself, because it is this sense of empathy stirred up by cinematic elements, it lacks. In this Mira Nair/Jhumpa Lahiri epic, if the book weaves it, the movie creates it.

Jarring Notes: Why did Gogol and Moushumi (Zuleikha Robinson) break-out into an impromptu jig during their Suhaag Raat?

A must watch. Brilliant performances from the cast Tabu, Irfan Khan, Kal Penn (he should be getting more than just ethnic two bit Hollywood roles to play now), Zuelikha Robinson and Jacinda Barrett.

Monday, March 12, 2007

Movie Review: 300

The battle of Thermopylae. 300 Personal Bodyguards of King Leonidas I face the powerful half a million strong persian army. "Come get them (arms)" Leonidas tells the messenger that Xerxes dispatches in the hope of an arms surrender and a pre-battle truce, as the two armies meet along a mountain pass where "numbers count for nothing". Historical accounts tell us that Leonidas took his personal body guards to the battlefield because Spartan customs did not approve of a mainstream army being engaged in war during the auspicious festive season. As per historical accounts 2 people survived that war. Hollywood, with its well known potential of casting to celluloid the most heroic of stories, had not stumbled across this story yet and one wonders why. When it finally discovered it, courtesy a Novel written by Frank Miller, it told this story....and how...

First things first welcome to a genre where post production work takes over more time and effort than it takes for the film to be canned. Every effect is larger than life, and where it departs from a Matrix or a Jurassic park is that visual technology is embedded into each and every nuance and expression in the film. In order to tell this story larger than life, Zack Snyder has taken the movie frame by frame, touched up every facet of the character, the background the score and the camera angles with post production genuis. So if you see the pectorals of King Leonidas (Gerard Butler) twitching even as he screams "This is Spartaaaaa", you will not be surprised that it takes little more than his exertions to twitch them in that particular way. So for us it looks like a whole new canvass because there is no "this is celluloid" and "this is animation" speculation. It is all one seamless whole.

That said, the film presents dollops of gore and graphic violence to the unsuspecting audience. The "special effect" feel though takes some sheen off the gruesome battle scenes. Creditably, just when you feel that the bloodletting is getting to you, the screenplay seamlessly integrates the confrontation of the political establishment and the Queen (Lena Heady). I thought one particular aspect of the screenplay was dubious and meant more to tintillate than anything else. That was the Queen submitting to the scheming minister (Dominic West) as his price for supporting her proposal of sending back-up troops for the King (was she just Blonde, one would think...ha ha ha). The depiction of Xerxes and his kinks were too close to the comic book barbarian villainy that we have grown up on. But one can forgive Zack Snyder for that. Why?


This is a pathbreaking movie. A must see for adults. Great Performances. Greater post production work. Huge canvass and a very very well told story. If Ved Vyas were alive today, he would have asked for an appointment with Zack Snyder to discuss the "script" for "Mahabharata". It is about time...

Recommended sources of knowledge about Sparta and King Leonidas

Monday, January 15, 2007

Guru - Movie Review

Good movies are generally categorized as "Paisa Vasool" types or "fundoo" types. If we set the right expectations, we can sit back and enjoy the flick and not be disappointed. Then there are films like "Guru", where you walk into the cinema expecting to see an equivalent of "A Beautiful Mind" or "Cindrella Man". Not for nothing. The plot is a Movie Director's delight, lifting, inspirational, dark and redeeming by turns. All shades of a great growth story epitomised by real life examples. There is no stereotypical black and white here. Every character has a different shade of grey. To top it the director is the finest story teller in the Indian film industry. How does he treat it?

In the earlier part of the movie he spends some time building GuruKant's character. Impressive start. Everything else is fast forward, except the songs that takes up gruelling 30 minutes of story telling time. When you are treating a subject as real life as this, we don't expect Aishwarya's character to do an introductory jig and then back it up with another one when she has just delivered twin girls. To accommodate all the dancing and merriment, imagine what we missed. The blow by blow account, ostensibly inspired by the wealth creator of our times, who used the system for what ever it was worth and created a business model in itself. Like i said, inspirational, redeeming, dark and vainglorious. Mani Ratnam has sacrificed good film making for 30 minutes of Jhatka Matkas. Which brings me to the question. Why do Indian Film makers think that rooted stories told as is, will not register with the masses? If Bollywood makes a movie on Gandhi, will we still have Mohandas sing songs with Ba? Our film industry trivializes the most appealing of stories and makes it nothing more than Tamasha. The movie can be summarized thus,

Young Gurukant, goes to turkey, shows promise (better part of the movie)
-----Song-------
Aishwarya Rai Intro
-----Song-----
Marriage with Aishwarya, opens factory
-----Song-----
Kids, goes public
-----Song-----
Tussle with his mentor (Mithun - based on RPG??), Guru's struggle period
---Song----
Paralysis & Trial by commission
---Song---
The come back (we are not shown how this happens)

THE END.

From Mani Ratnam, we had not expected this.

Positives: Watch the movie for Abhishek Bachchan. I never thought he had anything going for him other than his father. But hold it, this guy can deliver and deliver with panache. The mannerisms he uses, the accent and the intensity with which he plays the character is amazing. Mithun is competent. Aishwarya is wasted. Maddy and Vidya do not have much to do anyway.

Music: The villain of the piece. Used in-appropriately. A typical AR Rahman dish-out. But wait, there is one exceptional song "Barso Re". "Yammo Yammo" is catchy. Why did Abhishek have to lip sync to AR Rahman's voice in "Dam mast"? Some questions will remain unanswered in Bollywood.

Moral: Slick Editing, pretty faces and 6 songs does not a good film make.